Home - Blank Rome LLP

Register to receive insights and analyses on breaking news and trends across varying industries.
<a class="link-primary mt-4" href="/subscribe">Subscribe</a>

Philadelphia, PA

New York, NY

Wilmington, DE

Cincinnati, OH

Princeton, NJ

Los Angeles, CA

Houston, TX

Tampa, FL

Shanghai

South Florida

Pittsburgh, PA

Washington, D.C.

Chicago, IL

Orange County, CA

Dallas, TX

Boston, MA

On May 28, 2025, the United States Court of International Trade (“CIT”) issued a landmark decision in&nbsp;V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. United States,<a href="https://www.blankrome.com/publications/navigating-uncertainty-how-recent-ieepa-tariff-rulings-impact-maritime-industry#_ftn1">[1]</a>&nbsp;holding that tariffs imposed by the President under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”) exceeded the statutory authority granted by Congress. The CIT vacated the challenged tariff orders and permanently enjoined their enforcement nationwide. However, less than 24 hours later, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit temporarily stayed the CIT’s order, preserving the tariffs while the government’s appeal is pending. A separate decision from the D.C. District Court also found the President’s IEEPA tariffs to be beyond the scope of the statute, though it imposed a more limited injunction.<a href="https://www.blankrome.com/publications/navigating-uncertainty-how-recent-ieepa-tariff-rulings-impact-maritime-industry#_ftn2">[2]</a>

core/paragraph

The CIT’s decision is significant for the maritime industry, as it directly challenges the President’s ability to impose broad, unbounded tariffs on imports under IEEPA. The CIT emphasized that IEEPA does not grant the President unlimited authority to regulate importation through tariffs, and that any such delegation of power must be clearly limited and guided by statutory principles. The CIT found that the tariffs in question—ranging from a 10 percent rate on all imports to higher, country-specific duties—were not sufficiently tied to the “unusual and extraordinary threat” required by IEEPA and lacked meaningful limitations in scope or duration.

Immediate Impact on the Maritime Industry

Although the CIT’s decision would have set aside all tariffs imposed under the challenged executive orders, the Federal Circuit’s stay means that these tariffs remain in effect for now. This ongoing legal uncertainty has several immediate implications for the maritime industry:

Continued Tariff Collection. Maritime carriers, freight forwarders, and port operators must continue to process shipments subject to the existing tariffs, as the stay preserves the status quo pending further judicial review.

core/list-item

Operational Uncertainty. The potential for a sudden removal or reinstatement of tariffs creates significant unpredictability for shipping schedules, contract negotiations, and supply chain planning. Maritime stakeholders should be prepared for rapid changes in tariff policy as the litigation progresses.

Customs and Compliance Considerations. Importers and logistics providers must remain vigilant in tracking the status of the litigation and any changes to tariff enforcement. Accurate documentation and compliance with current tariff requirements remain essential to avoid penalties or delays.

core/list

Long-Term Implications for Maritime Trade

The CIT’s decision, if upheld, would have far-reaching consequences for the maritime industry:

Potential Elimination of Additional Duties. If the tariffs are vacated, importers would no longer be subject to the additional duties imposed under the challenged executive orders. This could lead to increased cargo volumes and reduced costs for shippers and their customers.

Judicial Scrutiny of Emergency Tariffs. The decision signals that future attempts to use IEEPA to impose broad tariffs—especially as leverage in trade negotiations or to address general trade deficits—will face significant judicial scrutiny. This may provide greater predictability and stability for maritime trade policy going forward.

Distinction from Section 232 Tariffs. It is important to note that the CIT’s decision does not affect tariffs imposed under other authorities, such as Section 232 duties on steel, aluminum, and automobiles. These measures remain in place and continue to impact certain segments of the maritime industry.

Next Steps and Recommendations

Given the dynamic nature of the current legal landscape, maritime stakeholders should vigilantly monitor ongoing litigation developments and be ready to adapt their operations in response to changes in tariff policies. It is advisable to consult with legal counsel regarding the status of duties paid under the relevant tariffs and potential refund procedures if these tariffs are ultimately overturned. Maintaining robust compliance programs is essential to ensure adherence to all applicable customs and tariff requirements during this period of uncertainty.

Recent court rulings emphasize the importance of statutory limits on presidential authority to impose tariffs, highlighting the need for maritime industry stakeholders to stay informed and agile as the situation evolves.

This article is one in a series of articles written for Blank Rome’s <a href="/news-and-events/mainbrace-june-2025/" id="25921">MAINBRACE: June 2025</a> edition.

core/separator

<a href="https://www.blankrome.com/publications/navigating-uncertainty-how-recent-ieepa-tariff-rulings-impact-maritime-industry#_ftnref1">[1]</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cit.uscourts.gov/sites/cit/files/25-66.pdf">cit.uscourts.gov/sites/cit/files/25-66.pdf</a>

<a href="https://www.blankrome.com/publications/navigating-uncertainty-how-recent-ieepa-tariff-rulings-impact-maritime-industry#_ftnref2">[2]</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/contreras-blocks-certain-trump-tariffs.pdf">courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/contreras-blocks-certain-trump-tariffs.pdf</a>

Navigating Uncertainty: How Recent IEEPA Tariff Rulings Impact the Maritime Industry

Offices

Stay Connected

Slide Menu

Slide Search

Navigating Uncertainty: How Recent IEEPA Tariff Rulings Impact the Maritime Industry

Offices

Stay Connected