Home - Blank Rome LLP

Register to receive insights and analyses on breaking news and trends across varying industries.
<a class="link-primary mt-4" href="/subscribe">Subscribe</a>

Philadelphia, PA

New York, NY

Wilmington, DE

Cincinnati, OH

Princeton, NJ

Los Angeles, CA

Houston, TX

Tampa, FL

Shanghai

South Florida

Pittsburgh, PA

Washington, D.C.

Chicago, IL

Orange County, CA

Dallas, TX

Boston, MA

In&nbsp;Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Garland, et al., a federal district court judge issued a nationwide preliminary injunction barring enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”), finding that the CTA likely exceeds Congress’s powers. Therefore, at present, a reporting company is not obligated to comply with the CTA and the government is enjoined from enforcing the CTA’s reporting requirements. As expected, on December 5, 2024, the government entered a notice of appeal of the preliminary injunction and may still seek a stay of the preliminary injunction pending the appeal. If a stay is granted by the Court of Appeals, the reporting obligations would once again be in effect. The Court of Appeals could also decide to keep the preliminary injunction in place while an appeal is pending.

core/paragraph

At this time, companies are not required to file Beneficial Ownership Information (“BOI”) reports, although they are free to do so should they choose. Indeed, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) issued guidance after the entry of the notice of appeal, stating as much:&nbsp;“In light of a recent federal court order, reporting companies are not currently required to file beneficial ownership information with FinCEN and are not subject to liability if they fail to do so while the order remains in force. However, reporting companies may continue to voluntarily submit beneficial ownership information reports.”&nbsp;(available at&nbsp;https://www.fincen.gov/boi.)&nbsp;

At present, it is unknown how long companies would be given to file if the preliminary injunction is stayed, modified or the law is ultimately upheld. However, FinCEN’s statement suggests that a reasonable extension of time for filing can be expected, though that is not a certainty. Of course, if the CTA is ultimately struck down, no filing would be required.

For more information or assistance, contact <a href="/people/jeffrey-rosenfeld/" id="19362">Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld</a>, <a href="/people/jacob-m-brownstein/" id="19003">Jacob M. Brownstein</a>, or a member of Blank Rome’s <a href="/services-and-industries/corporate/" id="18405">Corporate</a> group.

core/button

core/buttons

core/separator

©2024 Blank Rome LLP. All rights reserved. Please contact Blank Rome for permission to reprint. Notice: The purpose of this update is to identify select developments that may be of interest to readers. The information contained herein is abridged and summarized from various sources, the accuracy and completeness of which cannot be assured. This update should not be construed as legal advice or opinion, and is not a substitute for the advice of counsel.

Download This Alert

Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld

Jacob M. Brownstein

Corporate

Mergers & Acquisitions

Alert

Publications

Federal District Court Issues Nationwide Preliminary Injunction Barring Enforcement of Corporate Transparency Act

Federal District Court Issues Nationwide Preliminary Injunction Barring Enforcement of Corporate Transparency Act

Offices

Stay Connected

Slide Menu

Slide Search

Federal District Court Issues Nationwide Preliminary Injunction Barring Enforcement of Corporate Transparency Act

Offices

Stay Connected