Home - Blank Rome LLP

Register to receive insights and analyses on breaking news and trends across varying industries.
<a class="link-primary mt-4" href="/subscribe">Subscribe</a>

Philadelphia, PA

New York, NY

Wilmington, DE

Cincinnati, OH

Princeton, NJ

Los Angeles, CA

Houston, TX

Tampa, FL

Shanghai

South Florida

Pittsburgh, PA

Washington, D.C.

Chicago, IL

Orange County, CA

Dallas, TX

Boston, MA

President Trump issued an Executive Order (“EO”) on August 7 that overhauls the federal grantmaking process. Titled “<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/08/improving-oversight-of-federal-grantmaking/">Improving Oversight of Federal Grantmaking</a>,” the EO identifies deficiencies in the federal government’s current approach to issuing discretionary grants. The EO criticizes some existing federal grants as an “offensive waste of tax dollars” and promoting “anti-American ideologies,” and contends grants have been issued to “organizations that actively work against American interests abroad.” It also identifies defects in the grant approval process, noting that drafting grant applications is “notoriously complex” and therefore too costly for smaller institutions. The EO seeks to align federal grants with the Administration’s policy preferences and give the Administration greater control to select grant recipients. Here are the relevant highlights and takeaways:

core/paragraph

The EO expands the federal government’s ability to terminate grants.

A core feature of the EO is requiring all discretionary grants, current and future, to include termination for convenience clauses. Discretionary grants are those where an agency exercises its own judgment to select both the funding amount and the grantee, such as by basing award on the merits of grant applications via a competitive process. Historically, discretionary grants have not included termination for convenience clauses. For example, the Uniform Guidance,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-2/subtitle-A/chapter-II/part-200?toc=1">2 C.F.R. § 200</a>, does not include a provision that permits the federal government to terminate a discretionary grant at its leisure. This is in contrast to typical federal contracts, which invariably include termination for convenience provisions, such as&nbsp;<a href="https://www.acquisition.gov/far/52.249-2">FAR 52.249-2</a>.

Read the full post on our&nbsp;<a href="https://governmentcontractsnavigator.com/2025/08/20/trump-administration-increases-oversight-of-federal-grants/">Government Contracts Navigator</a>&nbsp;blog.

Trump Administration Increases Oversight of Federal Grants

Offices

Stay Connected

Slide Menu

Slide Search

Trump Administration Increases Oversight of Federal Grants

Offices

Stay Connected